In Italy, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was in the forefront of philately, too. In fact, adhesive stamps were first introduced in the Kingdom under the reign of Ferdinand II.

1/2 GRAIN I Table + II Table Paper of Naples

The first proposal of such a stamp was made to the King in 1841 by architect Amy Autran, when she came back from a trip to London, where she had noted that the public had accepted with favour the introduction of the first stamps. Autran prepared some samples with the face of Ferdinand II crowned with laurel in an oval frame, after a drawing by a so-called Thomas engraved by Wlliam Cave.

These samples were printed using chalcography in sheets with 15 stamps each, whereas the printing was made in black, slate-blue, olive green and reddish brown.

Unfortunately, due to the slowness of bureaucracy, a Committee to study “all necessary or useful improvements to the General Administration of Royal Mail and Courier” was established only in January 1857. This Committee worked with promptness and on 16 July 1857 Ferdinand II could issue a decree reorganising the Royal Mail. .

Sicily - The only letter found in the United States, after crossing from Marseille, Le Havre and New York, bearing a three-colour wonderful stamp. It is a unique and highly interesting document (Rothschild former collection)

It came into force on 1 January 1858, the very day in which the first and sole issue was made:

Sicily- A sumptuous stamp to Germany made up by six of the seven stamps issued , among which the very rare 50 grains, now known only in seven specimens on letters to go abroad. This is a unique value, for its destination, and its multicoloured and iridescent postage

the use of stamp became compulsory for everybody and also the fee was the same for all distances, although it changed according to the volume and weight of the letter. «Moreover, the principle of uniformity was deemed as the right one, because the postal fee was seen as both a refund for a service made by the State and as an indirect taxation similar for all citizens. It was also seen as a useful principle, since it would have certainly increased the returns, and as a necessary one because this simplification would have made the use of stamps easy for everybody» .